Jud- and iud- in the thomistic bibligioraphy

Also am checking up dream, sensa, sleep, somn in each one (excepting a)

Ashmore Jr., R. B., «The Analogical Notion of Judgment in St. Thomas Aquinas». (Dissertatio doctoralis: University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, 1966) 239 pp.

Barad, J. A., «Aquinas on the Role of Emotion in Moral Judgment and Activity». The Thomist 55/3 (1991) 397-414.

Durbin, P. T., «Unity and Composition in Judgment». The Thomist 31 (1967) 83-120.

Eslick, L., «The Negative Judgment of Separation: A Reply to Father Burell». The Modern Schoolman 44 (1966) 35-46.

Fitzpatrick, F. J., «Aristotle, Aquinas, and Ryle: Thought Processes and Judgment». Philosophical Studies (Ireland) 31 (1986-1987) 197-227.

Gallagher, D. M., «Free Choice and Free Judgment in Thomas Aquinas». Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 76/3 (1994) 247-277.

I THINK THIS IS THE BOOK FR. DEWAN WAS REFERRING TO - YES!!

Garceau, B., «Judicium: vocabulaire, sources, doctrine de saint Thomas d'Aquin». (Publications de l'Institut d'Études Médiévales (Université de Montreal), 20: Institut d'Études Médiévales - J. Vrin, Montréal - Paris, 1968) 286 pp.

Judge, B., «Thoughts, and Their Contents». American Philosophical Quarterly 20 (1983) 365-374

Knasas, J. F. X., «Esse as the Target of Judgment in Rahner and Aquinas». The Thomist 51 (1987) 222-245.

McCool, G. A., «History, Insight, and Judgment in Thomism». International Philosophical Quarterly 27 (1987) 299-313

McNicholl, A. J., «On Judging». The Thomist 38 (1974): «Centenary of St. Thomas Aquinas 1274-1974», 768-825.

Owens, J., «Judgment and Truth in Aquinas». Mediaeval Studies 32 (1970) 138-158

Renard, H., «The Metaphysics of the Existential Judgment». The New Scholasticism 23 (1949) 387-394.

Schultz, J. L., «Ought Judgments: A Descriptivist Analysis from a Thomistic Perspective». The New Scholasticism 61 (1987) 400-426.

Schultz-Aldrich, J. L., «Being as the Ground of Truth in Aquinas». The Heythrop Journal 50/4 (2009) 620-634.

Tyrrell, F. M., «The Role of Assent in Judgment: A Thomistic Study». (Dissertatio doctoralis: Philosophical Studies, 100: The Catholic University of America Press, Washington, 1948) XIII, 184 pp.

Tyrrell, F. M., «Concerning the Nature and Function of the Act of Judgment». The New Scholasticism 26 (1952).

Veatch, H. B., «St. Thomas and the Question How Are Synthetic Judgments a priori Possible?». The Modern Schoolman 42 (1965) 239-264.

SENSA

Aloysius, M., «Toward a Thomistic Theory of Sensation». The Thomist 20 (1957) 143-157.

Ledvina, J. P., «A Philosophy and Psychology of Sensation, with Special Reference to Vision, According to the Principles of St. Thomas Aquinas». (The Catholic University of America Press, Washington, 1941) XIII, 143 pp.

Klubertanz, G. P., «De potentia 5, 8: Note on the Thomist Theory of Sensation». The Modern Schoolman 27 (1949) 323-331.

Mansion, A., «Le commentaire de saint Thomas sur le De sensu et sensato d'Aristote. Utilisation d'Alexandre d'Afrodise». A. Mansion; et alii (eds.),Mélanges Mandonnet. Études d'histoire littéraire et doctrinale du Moyen Âge, t. 1 (Bibliothèque Thomiste, 13: J. Vrin, Paris, 1930) 83-102.

Plippen, D. W., «A Problem Concerning Relation in Sensation». Pontificia Accademia Romana di San Tommaso d'Aquino (ed.), Tommaso d'Aquino nel suo settimo centenario. Atti del Congresso Internazionale (Roma-Napoli, 17-24 aprile 1974), t. 9: Il cosmo e la scienza (Edizioni Domenicane Italiane, Napoli, 1978) 307-314.

Schneider, M. G., «The Dependence of St. Thomas' Psychology of Sensation upon His Physics». Franciscan Studies 22 (1962) 3-31.

Simon, Y. R.; Péghaire, J. L., «The Philosophical Study of Sensation». The Modern Schoolman 23 (1946) 111-119.

Tweedale, M. M., «Origins of the Medieval Theory That Sensation Is an Immaterial Reception of a Form». Philosophical Topics 20/2 (1992) 215-231.

Van Riet, G., «La théorie thomiste de la sensation externe». Revue Philosophique de Louvain 51 (1953) 374-408.

White, A. L., «The Picture Theory of the Phantasm». Tópicos 29 (2005): «Imaginación, sensación y pensamiento en los comentadores árabes y latinos de Aristóteles (siglos X-XIII)», 131-155.